AMB Property Corporation
Net income available to common stockholders per fully diluted share ("EPS") for the second quarter of 2009 was $0.12, as compared to $0.73 for the same quarter in 2008.
As of June 30, 2009, the company has completed property contributions and sales of $461 million, with a stabilized capitalization rate of 6.9 percent, year-to-date.
During the second quarter, the company completed sales totaling $156 million, with a 7.8 percent capitalization rate, consisting of the following:
-- The sale of three development properties in the Americas for an aggregate price of $75 million; and -- The sale of eight properties from its U.S. operating portfolio for an aggregate sales price of $82 million.
"We have made excellent progress on our top two priorities through the first half of this year. As such, we have reduced our share of outstanding debt by approximately $750 million and our G&A costs by 30 percent on a run-rate basis," said Hamid R. Moghadam, chairman & CEO. "These accomplishments further enable us to navigate the current challenges in the operating environment and have positioned the company to take advantage of opportunities in the future."
Demonstrating the company's continued ability to access the credit markets and manage its debt maturities, AMB has completed approximately $1.0 billion of debt repayments, repurchases and extensions, year-to-date. In the second quarter of 2009, the company repaid, repurchased and extended approximately $241 million of its overall debt, which included $183 million in bonds repurchased at a yield-to-maturity of 6.3 percent.
As of June 30, 2009, AMB's share of total debt to share of total assets was 44 percent. The company's liquidity was approximately $1.2 billion as of June 30, 2009, consisting of $1.0 billion of availability on its lines of credit and $209 million of cash.
"With our year-to-date disposition activities, equity offering and debt repurchases, we have more than enough liquidity and continue to be well-positioned to address our capital requirements into 2013," said Thomas S. Olinger, AMB's chief financial officer.
During the quarter, the company commenced developments on a previously committed project in Europe and a pre-leased build-to-suit in the Americas, totaling 221,000 square feet (20,600 square meters), with a total estimated investment of $31 million.
AMB's global development pipeline at quarter end, which included investments held through unconsolidated joint ventures, totaled approximately 9.0 million square feet (836,600 square meters) scheduled for delivery through 2010, with an estimated total investment cost of $758 million. As of June 30, 2009, the company's share of the projected remaining cash to fund the completion of its development pipeline was reduced to $89 million. The development pipeline was approximately 25 percent pre-leased as of June 30, 2009, with approximately 5.8 million square feet (541,300 square meters) of leasing remaining in order to stabilize the pipeline.
During the second quarter of 2009, the company commenced leases of approximately 5.8 million square feet (573,000 square meters) in its global operating portfolio. In its development pipeline, the company leased more than 434,000 square feet (40,300 square meters).
"Second quarter lease commencements in our operating portfolio are in line with our four year average and our expectations. Lease up of our development pipeline remains a high priority in this challenging environment. While we expect it will take some time for demand to rebound, we're encouraged by the recent increased number of showings and negotiations," commented Mr. Moghadam.
Owned and Managed Portfolio Operating Results
AMB's operating portfolio was 90.5 percent occupied at June 30, 2009, with an average occupancy rate of 91.1 percent for the second quarter of 2009. Cash basis same store net operating income ("SS NOI"), without the effects of lease termination fees, decreased 4.1 percent in the second quarter, driven primarily by lower average same store occupancies and the effect of foreign currency exchange. Average rent change on renewals and rollovers in AMB's operating portfolio decreased by 2.5 percent for the quarter and remained flat for the trailing four quarters ended June 30, 2009.
2009 FFO Guidance
The company narrows its previous full-year 2009 FFO guidance to $1.41 to $1.45 per share, without recognition of gains from development activities, non-cash impairment charges or restructuring charges. The full-year EPS guidance is a loss of $0.64 to $0.68 per share.
Supplemental Earnings Measures
Included in the footnotes to the company's attached financial statements is a discussion of why management believes FFO, FFOPS and FFO, excluding impairment charges and restructuring charges (the "FFO Measures") are useful supplemental measures of operating performance, ways in which investors might use the FFO Measures when assessing the company's financial performance and the FFO Measures' limitations as a measurement tool. Reconciliation from net income available to common stockholders to the FFO Measures are provided in the attached tables and published in the company's quarterly supplemental analyst package, available on the company's website at www.amb.com.
AMB defines net operating income ("NOI") as rental revenues, including reimbursements, less property operating expenses. NOI excludes depreciation, amortization, general and administrative expenses, restructuring charges, real estate impairment losses, development profits (losses), gains (losses) from sale or contribution of real estate interests, and interest expense. AMB believes that net income, as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. However, NOI is a useful supplemental measure calculated to help investors understand AMB's operating performance, excluding the effects of costs and expenses which are not related to the performance of the assets. NOI is widely used by the real estate industry as a useful supplemental measure, which helps investors compare AMB's operating performance with that of other companies. Real estate impairment losses have been excluded in deriving NOI because AMB does not consider its impairment losses to be a property operating expense. AMB believes that the exclusion of impairment losses from NOI is a common methodology used in the real estate industry. Real estate impairment losses relate to the changing values of AMB's assets but do not reflect the current operating performance of the assets with respect to their revenues or expenses. AMB's real estate impairment losses are non-cash charges which represent the write down in the value of assets when estimated fair value over the holding period is lower than current carrying value. The impairment charges were principally a result of increases in estimated capitalization rates and deterioration in market conditions that adversely impacted underlying real estate values. Therefore, the impairment charges are not related to the current performance of AMB's real estate operations and should be excluded from its calculation of NOI.
AMB considers cash-basis same store net operating income ("SS NOI") to be a useful supplemental measure of our operating performance for properties that are considered part of the same store pool. AMB defines SS NOI as NOI on a same store basis excluding straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles. Same store pool includes all properties that are owned as of the end of both the current and prior year reporting periods and excludes development properties for both the current and prior reporting periods. The same store pool is set annually and excludes properties purchased and developments stabilized after December 31, 2007. AMB considers SS NOI to be an appropriate and useful supplemental performance measure because it reflects the operating performance of the real estate portfolio excluding effects of non-cash adjustments and provides a better measure of actual cash basis rental growth for a year-over-year comparison. In addition, AMB believes that SS NOI helps investors compare the operating performance of AMB's real estate as compared to other companies. While SS NOI is a relevant and widely used measure of operating performance of real estate investment trusts, it does not represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined by GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to those measures in evaluating our liquidity or operating performance. SS NOI also does not reflect general and administrative expenses, interest expenses, real estate impairment losses, depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures and leasing costs, or trends in development and construction activities that could materially impact our results from operations. Further, AMB's computation of SS NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating SS NOI. A reconciliation from net income to SS NOI is provided below and published in AMB's quarterly supplemental analyst package, available on AMB's website at www.amb.com.
For the For the Six Quarters Ended Months Ended June 30, June 30, ---------------- ----------------- 2009 2008 2009 2008 ------- ------ ------- ------- Net income (loss) $29,034 $88,030 $(94,322) $157,435 Private capital income (7,795) (41,413) (19,490) (51,336) Depreciation and amortization 38,724 39,730 80,460 80,214 Real estate impairment losses - - 161,067 - General and administrative and fund costs 25,685 34,128 57,193 69,475 Restructuring charges 3,824 - 3,824 - Total other income and expenses 22,134 (390) 27,943 (14,536) Total discontinued operations (14,544) (5,167) (18,020) (10,621) ------- ------ ------- ------- NOI 97,062 114,918 198,655 230,631 Less non same-store NOI (11,487) (26,839) (24,030) (51,783) Less non cash adjustments(1) 844 (607) 853 (1,794) ------- ------ ------- ------- Cash-basis same-store NOI $86,419 $87,472 $175,478 $177,054 ======= ======= ======== ======== (1) Non-cash adjustments include straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles for the same store pool only.
"Owned and managed" is defined by the company as assets in which the company has at least a 10 percent ownership interest, is the property or asset manager, and which it currently intends to hold for the long-term.
Conference Call Information
The company will host a conference call to discuss second quarter 2009 results on Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 10:00 AM PDT / 1:00 PM EDT. Stockholders and interested parties may listen to a live broadcast of the conference call by dialing 877 264 7865 (from the U.S. and Canada) or +1 706 643 7823 (from all other countries) and using reservation code 16501688. A webcast can be accessed through the company's website at www.amb.com in the Investor Relations section.
If you are unable to listen to the live conference call, a telephone and webcast replay will be available through the company's website at www.amb.com in the Investor Relations section after 12:00 PM PDT / 3:00 PM EDT on Tuesday, July 28, 2009 until 5:00 PM PDT / 8:00 PM EDT on Friday, August 28, 2009 at 800 642 1687 (from the U.S. and Canada) or +1 706 645 9291 (from all other countries), with the reservation code 16501688.
AMB Property Corporation. Local partner to global trade.(TM)
AMB Property Corporation is a leading owner, operator and developer of industrial real estate, focused on major hub and gateway distribution markets in the Americas, Europe and Asia. As of June 30, 2009, AMB owned, or had investments in, on a consolidated basis or through unconsolidated joint ventures, properties and development projects expected to total approximately 156.9 million square feet (14.6 million square meters) in 48 markets within 14 countries. AMB invests in properties located predominantly in the infill submarkets of its targeted markets. The company's portfolio is comprised of High Throughput Distribution facilities -- industrial properties built for speed and located near airports, seaports and ground transportation systems.
AMB's press releases are available on the company website at www.amb.com or by contacting the Investor Relations department at +1 415 394 9000.
Some of the information included in this press release contains forward-looking statements such as those related to our development projects (including completion, timing of stabilization and delivery, our share of remaining funding required, our ability to lease such projects, square feet at stabilization or completion, costs and total investment amounts), our ability to address our future capital commitments and reduce our cost structure, our ability to meet our forecasts (including our FFO, EPS and operating guidance) and business goals, our ability to weather the economic downturn and grow our business, and projected near-term capitalization rates, which are made pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, and you should not rely on the forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. The events or circumstances reflected in forward-looking statements might not occur. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "believes," "expects," "may," "will," "should," "seeks," "approximately," "intends," "plans," "pro forma," "estimates" or "anticipates" or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases. You can also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Forward-looking statements are necessarily dependent on assumptions, data or methods that may be incorrect or imprecise and we may not be able to realize them. We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our analysis only and speak only as of the date of this press release or the dates indicated in the statements. We assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements: defaults on or non-renewal of leases by tenants or renewal at lower than expected rent or failure to lease at all or on expected terms, decreases in real estate values and impairment losses, our failure to obtain, renew or extend financing or re-financing, risks related to debt and equity security financings (including dilution risk), our failure to divest properties we have contracted to sell or to timely reinvest proceeds from any divestitures, failure to maintain our current credit agency ratings or comply with our debt covenants, international currency and hedging risks, financial market fluctuations, changes in general economic conditions, global trade or in the real estate sector, inflation risks, a downturn in the U.S., California or global economy, increased interest rates and operating costs or greater than expected capital expenditures, risks related to suspending, reducing or changing our dividends, our failure to contribute properties to our co-investment ventures, risks related to our obligations in the event of certain defaults under co-investment ventures and other debt, difficulties in identifying properties to acquire and in effecting acquisitions, our failure to successfully integrate acquired properties and operations, risks and uncertainties affecting property development, value-added conversions, redevelopment and construction (including construction delays, cost overruns, our inability to obtain necessary permits and public opposition to these activities), our failure to qualify and maintain our status as a real estate investment trust, risks related to our tax structuring, environmental uncertainties, risks related to natural disasters, changes in real estate and zoning laws, risks related to doing business internationally and global expansion, risks of opening offices globally, risks of changing personnel and roles, losses in excess of our insurance coverage, unknown liabilities acquired in connection with acquired properties or otherwise and increases in real property tax rates. Our success also depends upon economic trends generally, including interest rates, income tax laws, governmental regulation, legislation, population changes and certain other matters discussed under the heading "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS(1) (in thousands, except per share data) For the Quarters For the Six Months Ended June 30, Ended June 30, ---------------- ------------------- 2009 2008 2009 2008 -------- -------- --------- -------- Revenues Rental revenues(1) $139,575 $161,127 $289,860 $321,323 Private capital revenues 7,795 41,413 19,490 51,336 -------- -------- --------- -------- Total revenues 147,370 202,540 309,350 372,659 -------- -------- --------- -------- Costs and expenses Property operating costs(1) (42,513) (46,209) (91,205) (90,692) Depreciation and amortization (38,724) (39,730) (80,460) (80,214) General and administrative (25,363) (33,744) (56,609) (68,869) Restructuring charges (3,824) - (3,824) - Fund costs (322) (384) (584) (606) Real estate impairment losses - - (161,067) - Other expenses(2) (5,684) (1,422) (5,022) (1,330) -------- -------- --------- -------- Total costs and expenses (116,430) (121,489) (398,771) (241,711) -------- -------- --------- -------- Other income and expenses Development profits, net of taxes - 30,402 33,286 48,222 Gains from sale or contribution of real estate interests, net - - - 19,967 Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, net 4,284 6,059 4,250 8,987 Other income(2) 8,595 1,883 1,529 6,293 Interest expense, including amortization (29,329) (36,532) (61,986) (67,603) -------- -------- --------- -------- Total other income and expenses, net (16,450) 1,812 (22,921) 15,866 -------- -------- --------- -------- Income (loss) from continuing operations 14,490 82,863 (112,342) 146,814 -------- -------- --------- -------- Discontinued operations Income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations 4,454 4,008 (10,684) 8,074 Gains from sale of real estate interests, net of taxes 10,090 1,159 28,704 2,547 -------- -------- --------- -------- Total discontinued operations 14,544 5,167 18,020 10,621 -------- -------- --------- -------- Net income (loss) 29,034 88,030 (94,322) 157,435 Noncontrolling interests' share of net (income) loss Joint venture partners' share of net (income) loss (4,949) (6,424) (2,771) (25,687) Joint venture partners' and limited partnership unitholders' share of development profits - (1,371) (1,108) (6,113) Preferred unitholders (1,432) (1,432) (2,864) (2,864) Limited partnership unitholders (1,279) (1,784) 4,041 (2,820) -------- -------- --------- -------- Total noncontrolling interests' share of net (income) loss (7,660) (11,011) (2,702) (37,484) -------- -------- --------- -------- Net income (loss) attributable to AMB Property Corporation 21,374 77,019 (97,024) 119,951 Preferred stock dividends (3,952) (3,952) (7,904) (7,904) Allocation to participating securities(3) (260) (666) (521) (1,018) -------- -------- --------- -------- Net income (loss) available to common stockholders $17,162 $72,401 $(105,449) $111,029 ======== ======== ========= ======== Net income (loss) per common share (diluted) $0.12 $0.73 $(0.86) $1.12 ======== ======== ========= ======== Weighted average common shares (diluted) 145,380 99,269 121,991 99,482 ======== ======== ========= ======== (1) On July 1, 2008, the partners of AMB Partners II (previously, a consolidated co-investment venture) contributed their interests in AMB Partners II to AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III in exchange for interests in AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, an unconsolidated co-investment venture. Pro forma rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 would have been $141,235 and $281,806, respectively, and pro forma operating expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 would have been $41,387 and $80,619, respectively, if AMB Partners II had been deconsolidated as of January 1, 2008. (2) Includes changes in liabilities and assets associated with AMB's deferred compensation plan for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 of $5,462 and $4,179, respectively. (3) Represents net income (loss) attributable to AMB Property Corporation, net of preferred stock dividends, allocated to outstanding unvested restricted shares. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, there were 930 unvested restricted shares outstanding. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, there were 893 unvested restricted shares outstanding. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS(1) (in thousands, except per share data) For the Quarters For the Six Months Ended June 30, Ended June 30, ----------------- ------------------ 2009 2008 2009 2008 ------- -------- -------- -------- Net income (loss) available to common stockholders $17,162 $72,401 $(105,449) $111,029 Gains from sale or contribution of real estate interests, net of taxes (10,090) (1,159) (28,704) (22,514) Depreciation and amortization Total depreciation and amortization 38,724 39,730 80,460 80,214 Discontinued operations' depreciation 592 1,162 2,315 2,351 Non-real estate depreciation (1,953) (2,155) (4,090) (3,789) Adjustments to derive FFO from consolidated joint ventures Joint venture partners' noncontrolling interests (Net income (loss)) 4,949 6,424 2,771 25,687 Limited partnership unitholders' noncontrolling interests (Net income (loss)) 1,279 1,784 (4,041) 2,820 Limited partnership unitholders' noncontrolling interests (Development profits) - 1,175 1,108 1,704 FFO attributable to noncontrolling interests (7,151) (16,417) (10,863) (32,993) Adjustments to derive FFO from unconsolidated joint ventures AMB's share of net income (4,284) (6,059) (4,250) (8,987) AMB's share of FFO 11,786 12,276 19,310 21,138 Allocation to participating securities(2) (66) (335) - (596) ------- -------- -------- -------- Funds from operations $50,948 $108,827 $(51,433) $176,064 ======= ======== ======== ======== FFO per common share and unit (diluted) $0.34 $1.05 $(0.41) $1.70 ======= ======== ======== ======== Weighted average common shares and units (diluted) 148,815 103,241 125,427 103,457 ======= ======== ======== ======== Adjustments for impairment and restructuring charges Real estate impairment losses $- $- $161,067 $- Discontinued operations' real estate impairment losses - - 20,786 - AMB's share of real estate impairment losses from unconsolidated joint ventures - - 4,611 - Joint venture partners' noncontrolling interest share of real estate impairment losses - - (4,876) - ------- -------- -------- -------- AMB's share of total impairment charges - - 181,588 - Restructuring charges 3,824 - 3,824 - Allocation to participating securities(2) (24) - (497) - ------- -------- -------- -------- Funds from operations, excluding impairment and restructuring charges 54,748 108,827 133,482 176,064 ======= ======== ======== ======== FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges per common share and unit (diluted) $0.37 $1.05 $1.06 $1.70 ======= ======== ======== ======== Weighted average common shares and units (diluted) 148,815 103,241 125,451 103,457 ======= ======== ======== ======== (1) Funds From Operations ("FFO"), Funds From Operations Per Share and Unit ("FFOPS") and FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges (together with FFO and FFOPS, the "FFO Measures"). AMB believes that net income, as defined by U.S. GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. However, AMB considers funds from operations, or FFO, FFO per share and unit, or FFOPS, and FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges, to be useful supplemental measures of its operating performance. AMB defines FFOPS as FFO per fully diluted weighted average share of AMB's common stock and operating partnership units. AMB calculates FFO as net income available to common stockholders, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, less gains (or losses) from dispositions of real estate held for investment purposes and real estate-related depreciation, and adjustments to derive AMB's pro rata share of FFO of consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. Unless stated otherwise, AMB includes the gains from development, including those from value-added conversion projects, before depreciation recapture, as a component of FFO. AMB believes that value-added conversion dispositions are in substance land sales and as such should be included in FFO, consistent with the real estate investment trust industry's long standing practice to include gains on the sale of land in FFO. However, AMB's interpretation of FFO or FFOPS may not be consistent with the views of others in the real estate investment trust industry, who may consider it to be a divergence from the NAREIT definition, and may not be comparable to FFO or FFOPS reported by other real estate investment trusts that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than AMB does. In connection with the formation of a joint venture, AMB may warehouse assets that are acquired with the intent to contribute these assets to the newly formed venture. Some of the properties held for contribution may, under certain circumstances, be required to be depreciated under U.S. GAAP. If this circumstance arises, AMB intends to include in its calculation of FFO gains or losses related to the contribution of previously depreciated real estate to joint ventures. Although such a change, if instituted, will be a departure from the current NAREIT definition, AMB believes such calculation of FFO will better reflect the value created as a result of the contributions. To date, AMB has not included gains or losses from the contribution of previously depreciated warehoused assets in FFO. In addition to presenting FFO as described above, AMB presents FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges. AMB calculates FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges, as FFO less impairment and restructuring charges and adjustments to derive AMB's share of impairment charges from consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. To the extent that the book value of a land parcel or development asset exceeded the fair market value of a property, based on its intended holding period, a non-cash impairment charge was recognized for the shortfall. The impairment charges were principally a result of increases in estimated capitalization rates and deterioration in market conditions that adversely impacted values. The restructuring charges reflected costs associated with AMB's reduction in global headcount and cost structure. Although difficult to predict, these charges may be recurring given the uncertainty of the current economic climate and its adverse effects on the real estate markets. While not infrequent or unusual in nature, these charges are subject to market fluctuations that can have inconsistent effects on AMB's results of operations. The economics underlying these charges reflect market conditions in the short-term but can obscure the value of AMB's long-term investment decisions and strategies. Management believes FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges, is significant and useful to both it and its investors because it more appropriately reflects the value and strength of AMB's business model and its potential performance isolated from the volatility of the current economic environment. However, in addition to the limitations of FFO Measures generally discussed below, FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges, does not present a comprehensive measure of AMB's financial condition and operating performance. This measure is a modification of the NAREIT definition of FFO and should not be considered a replacement of FFO as AMB defines it or used as an alternative to net income or cash as defined by U.S. GAAP. AMB believes that the FFO Measures are meaningful supplemental measures of its operating performance because historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with U.S. GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, as reflected through depreciation and amortization expenses. However, since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market and other conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient. Thus, the FFO Measures are supplemental measures of operating performance for real estate investment trusts that exclude historical cost depreciation and amortization, among other items, from net income available to common stockholders, as defined by U.S. GAAP. AMB believes that the use of the FFO Measures, combined with the required U.S. GAAP presentations, has been beneficial in improving the understanding of operating results of real estate investment trusts among the investing public and making comparisons of operating results among such companies more meaningful. AMB considers the FFO Measures to be useful measures for reviewing comparative operating and financial performance because, by excluding gains or losses related to sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets and real estate depreciation and amortization, the FFO Measures can help the investing public compare the operating performance of a company's real estate between periods or as compared to other companies. While FFO and FFOPS are relevant and widely used measures of operating performance of real estate investment trusts, the FFO Measures do not represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined by U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to those measures in evaluating AMB's liquidity or operating performance. The FFO Measures also do not consider the costs associated with capital expenditures related to AMB's real estate assets nor are the FFO Measures necessarily indicative of cash available to fund AMB's future cash requirements. Management compensates for the limitations of the FFO Measures by providing investors with financial statements prepared according to U.S. GAAP, along with this detailed discussion of the FFO Measures and a reconciliation of the FFO Measures to net income available to common stockholders, a U.S. GAAP measurement. See Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations for a reconciliation of FFO from net income available to common stockholders. The following table reconciles projected FFO from projected net income available to common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2009: 2009 -------------- Low High ------ ------ Projected net loss available to common stockholders $(0.68) $(0.64) AMB's share of projected depreciation and amortization 1.20 1.20 AMB's share of projected gains on disposition of operating properties recognized to date (0.18) (0.18) Impact of additional dilutive securities, other, rounding (0.04) (0.04) ------ ------ Projected Funds From Operations (FFO) $0.30 $0.34 ====== ====== AMB's share of non-cash impairment charges 1.32 1.32 Restructuring charges 0.03 0.03 AMB's share of development gains recognized to date (0.24) (0.24) ------ ------ Projected FFO, excluding AMB's share of non-cash impairment charges, restructuring charges and development gains(3) $1.41 $1.45 ====== ====== Amounts are expressed per share, except FFO and FFO, excluding AMB's share of non-cash impairment charges, restructuring charges and development gains, which is expressed per share and unit. (2) Represents amount of FFO allocated to outstanding unvested restricted shares. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, there were 930 unvested restricted shares. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, there were 893 unvested restricted shares. (3) As development gains are difficult to predict in the current economic environment, management believes Projected FFO, excluding AMB's share of non-cash impairment charges, restructuring charges and development gains is the more appropriate and useful measure to reflect its assessment of AMB's projected operating performance. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (dollars in thousands) As of -------------------------------- June 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 ------------- ----------------- Assets Investments in real estate Total investments in properties $5,835,793 $6,603,856 Accumulated depreciation and amortization (1,014,490) (970,737) ---------- ---------- Net investments in properties 4,821,303 5,633,119 Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures 434,008 431,322 Properties held for sale or contribution, net 1,072,543 609,023 ---------- ---------- Net investments in real estate 6,327,854 6,673,464 Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash 209,345 251,231 Accounts receivable, net 142,288 160,528 Other assets 205,761 216,425 ---------- ---------- Total assets $6,885,248 $7,301,648 ========== ========== Liabilities and equity Liabilities Secured debt $1,383,862 $1,522,571 Unsecured senior debt 871,369 1,153,926 Unsecured credit facilities 594,942 920,850 Other debt 392,113 392,838 Accounts payable and other liabilities 351,049 345,259 ---------- ---------- Total liabilities 3,593,335 4,335,444 Equity Stockholders' equity Common equity 2,647,890 2,291,695 Preferred equity 223,412 223,412 ---------- ---------- Total stockholders' equity 2,871,302 2,515,107 Noncontrolling interests Joint venture partners 280,714 293,367 Preferred unitholders 77,561 77,561 Limited partnership unitholders 62,336 80,169 ---------- ---------- Total noncontrolling interests 420,611 451,097 ---------- ---------- Total equity 3,291,913 2,966,204 ---------- ---------- Total liabilities and equity $6,885,248 $7,301,648 ========== ==========
First Call Analyst: Robinson, Victoria
FCMN Contact: [email protected]
SOURCE: AMB Property Corporation
CONTACT: Tracy A. Ward, Vice President, IR & Corporate Communications,
Public Relations, +1-415-733-9532,
Web Site: http://www.amb.com/